Representative Urquhart... Thank you for taking the time to do this interview.
Your website Politicopia, a wiki-based website, fosters discussions of Utah state politics and issues of the day. Political analysts have credited Politicopia, and more broadly your leadership, for ushering in the nation's first statewide universal school voucher law.
On May 18, you attended the Personal Democracy Forum (PdF) conference in New York City. This year the theme at PdF is "The Flattening of Politics".
How is Politicopia flattening Utah state politics?
I'm happy to hog all the credit for passage of the voucher legislation, but of course there were many, many people and organizations that put in great efforts. Politicopia (and many other blogs) were helpful in passing the legislation. The Internet is a tremendous communications tool, and passing the legislation required a great deal of communicating.
A turning point occurred when the Chair of the State School Board broadcast an email that vouchers would financially harm public education. I posted his email on Politicopia, along with my rebuttal. I pointed out that he seemed to be incorrect, and I invited him to refute my numbers and assumptions on Politicopia. He didn't; he couldn't. Instead, he sent me a private email, saying he looked forward to working with me, etc. He had been called out on his misstatements. He and other board members no longer spread financial myths about the legislation. With that issue out of the way, we were able to focus on more pressing concerns.
Also, it was helpful for House members to follow the commentary on the Internet. One post on my blog, for example, had 50 comments. Two House members told me that the dialogue on Politicopia (and Internet dialogue elsewhere) convinced them that voting for the legislation would be the proper course. Since it passed by one vote, that is significant.
For too long, information has been closely held by political insiders like education unions in the case of vouchers. As Politicopia and other online efforts develop broader media, other arguments and perspectives will emerge. Ideally, political dialogue will become more informed, and results will become more in line with what the people want, instead of what the insiders want.

How did you come up with the idea for Politicopia?
In part, Politicopia is a reaction to the unhealthy amount of power held by special interests, bureaucrats, and the media. The site attempts to address the obstacles that keep people from participating politically. It provides unmediated information and opportunity to weigh in.
What did you hope to learn at last month's PdF Conference?
Are there any particular people, projects, or ideas that piqued your interest?
PdF offered me insights from people who've moved good ideas to successful implementation. I want help in making unmediated information and networked participation a reality in the political arena.
I was particularly excited to meet Tom Friedman and spending more time with Micah Sifry.
I understand you've served in the Utah House of Representatives for about 6 years now.. I'm sure you've come across some very colorful people and circumstances.
What is one of your favorite stories of things that you've observed while serving as a legislator?
Since we're talking about technology, I'll give you my favorite legislators-know-best story. When I entered the Legislature, it was near impossible for an average mortal to determine on the Legislative website how a legislator had voted on an issue. When I asked leadership about that, I was told that people would misinterpret the information.
Apparently, we were protecting them from themselves.
How do you think public officials and political institutions will use the Web, say five years from now in 2012?
Do you see any big transformations on the horizon for America's traditional political institutions like the political parties, elections, legislatures, local boards and councils (like school boards), and special interest groups?
As it has done with so many other enterprises, the Internet will transform politics. Thank heavens. People will have better access to information and greater ability to organize. Rather than send a letter and hope an elected official responds, people will be able to mobilize and, with that informed organization, they'll be able to force their officials to pay attention or else.
Also, elected officials will be able to take more risks. Currently, it's too easy for intermediaries to snuff out innovative ideas in the cradle. When people and their officials are closer and the middlemen aren't so free to distort the message politicians can try things without immediately being painted strange. I think most politicians don't yet appreciate the liberation the Internet could bring them.
One of my favorite social science books is Diffusion of Innovations by Everett Rogers, which offered a theory on how society adopts new ideas and technologies.
According to this theory, a person can be described as an innovator, early adopter, early majority, late majority, or laggard, in terms of how and when he/she accepts a new idea. (the Wikipedia entry is pretty good too)
Which of these adopter categories best describes today's legislators?
In general, what are politicians' attitudes toward leveraging the Web for political influence?
Legislators are cyclically early majority and laggards. When it comes to elections, we're more willing to be out on the forefront to be available to the people and to show that we get it. Once we're elected, we're more laggards.
Unfortunately, it's a bit like, "It's been nice talking with you. Now, leave me alone to do my work; we'll talk again next election cycle."
How did you get interested in launching your own websites on the Web?
Were there any specific circumstances or people that influenced you?
Everything I've done online is in response to things that haven't been working in some other way. When I expressed discouragement about low attendance at town meeings to my brother-in-law, a new media guy, he offered to help. He helped with my first static website, my blog, and now Politicopia. When he first talked about blogs, I got goosebumps, thinking about the possibilities for democracy. Now, while I still think blogs are great, I'm looking for something with Politicopia that is more interactive and fosters more of a bottom up approach.
Can you briefly describe the Parent Choice in Education Act, and how it recently became law? This was quite a political feat -- the first statewide universal school voucher law ever passed in the United States.
The voucher bill helps parents who opt out of the public education system pay for a portion of private school tuition. The poorer someone is, the more money they receive in assistance. The program is set up so that the amount of assistance is less than the amount the state would have paid to send the child to the public schools. So, everyone comes out ahead financially. Change is tough for organizations. And this change is tough for the education establishment to accept just like it was tough for the establishment to accept an increased focus on the core curriculum and vouchers for special needs children.
My understanding is that Utah's state school boards association and the state teachers union are currently mounting a referendum challenge to the Parent Choice in Education Act.
Where do things stand as of today?
The voters will decide in November whether the voucher program should go into effect. As I've detailed at SteveU.com, the issue is somewhat muddied by constitutional questions surrounding two voucher bills that were passed. It is difficult to fight special interests that can pin notes on children's shirts, but Utahns are a pretty smart bunch. If we are able to get out the actual facts about the law, we will win.
Do you have any special plans or projects for the coming summer, professionally and/or personally?
This summer I'm going to work on my tan.
That felt good to say, but actually I'm going to work too much, sleep too little, and try to have a bit of fun with the family. With any spare time, I'm going to work on Politicopia and try to make it a great tool for political dialogue.
It concerns me greatly that America is losing the ability to collaborate on difficult political issues. When we talk, we dispel rumors and focus on facts. Great things happen. I believe that one of those great things is passage of the voucher bill. After years of digging into the issue, a majority of policymakers understood it and passed it. Children and families will benefit for generations, as a result of that dialogue.
June 12, 2007